British colonization of the Americas

colonization of the Americas by the British Empire

The British colonization of the Americas is the history of the first relationships between England, Scotland, and Great Britain with North, South, and Central America and the Caribbean. This relationship is called colonization because an outside group forcefully took control of land and resources. This land that was taken over was called a colony.

The colonies of Great Britain in the Americas

Britain was not the first European country to build colonies in the Americas. People from Scandinavia built a colony called Vinland in the area of Newfoundland (now part of Canada) around 1000 AD. In 1492, Christopher Columbus told Spain about islands in the Carribean and it also built colonies.

English colonization started in 1585, when Sir Walter Raleigh built the doomed Roanoke Colony. The first successful English colony in the Americas was built in Jamestown, Virginia, in 1607. Around 30,000 Algonquian peoples lived in the region at the time. In 1620, a group of mostly Pilgrim people came to North America because they disagreed with Anglican England about religion. They built a colony on the coast of what is now Massachusetts. These two were the first of many North American colonies. The English also took over land in the Caribbean, including Barbados and Jamaica.

In the 1670s, England took over control of New Netherland from the Dutch. In 1763, Britain took control of the French colony of Canada, France's territory east of the Mississippi River, and several Caribbean territories

Many of the North American colonies separated from Britain by winning the American Revolutionary War, which ended in 1783. Historians refer to the British Empire after 1783 as the "Second British Empire." Britain cared about taking over economic control of Asia and Africa more than taking over land in the Americas. However, it did take over British Columbia, Trinidad, and British Guiana and build the Falkland Islands and British Honduras.

Most of the remaining colonies in North American joined the Confederation of Canada in the 1860s or 1870s, though Newfoundland did not join Canada until 1949. Britain stopped all control of Canada with the Statute of Westminster 1931. However, Britain and Canada are still connected. Canada recognizes the British monarch as head of state.

Other British colonies became countries during the Cold War. Many joined the Commonwealth of Nations to work together. Colonies that did not become countries are now called British Overseas Territories.

First failed colonies

change

England wanted to colonize North America to help in its religious war with Spain. A colony would provide a home for English privateers such as Francis Drake and Humphrey Gilbert.[1] Walter Raleigh paid for 500 men to go to Roanoke Island. In 1584, they began to build a colony there.[2] However, these men were not ready to live in North America. By 1590, they disappeared. People are not sure where they went. But many think that some of them left to find a new home, while others became part of local Native American groups.[3]

People also tried to build a colony in Newfoundland. But this failed, too.[4] Still, the English wanted to build colonies to help their economy and military.[5]

Early colonization, 1607–1630

change
 
King James I of England (1603–1625) was the king when people built Jamestown.

In 1606, King James I of England allowed both the Plymouth Company and the London Company to build homes in North America. In 1607, the London Company built a permanent colony at Jamestown on the Chesapeake Bay. About 30,000 Algonquian peoples lived in the region at the time.[6] However, the colonists at Jamestown found it very hard to live in Virginia. 1700 moved in, but by 1617, only 351 were alive.[7] Even though it was difficult, the settlers made a lot of money growing tobacco. This made more people move in. However, fighting with Native Americans took a lot of money. When the London Company ran out of money, the King took over. At this point, Jamestown and the area around it started to be called the Colony of Virginia.[8]

The first British people to live in Bermuda arrived in 1609 as an accident. People on the ship Sea Venture tried to go to Jamestown, but they stopped in Bermuda instead to avoid a hurricane. Most of them left for Jamestown in 1610. Only a few people stayed in Bermuda until 1612. Then more people arrived, including the first real leader, the Lieutenant-Governor.[9]

Bermuda had more people and made more money then Jamestown at first. It made money from selling tobacco. In the 1620s, Virginia and colonies in the Caribbean also started to make money from selling tobacco. This meant that Bermuda's tobacco was worth less money. Farmers in Bermuda started to grow food instead.[source?]

Between the late 1610s and the American Revolution, the British sent between 50,000 and 120,000 criminals to their American colonies.[10][11]

The Plymouth Company's Popham Colony did not last. Their first colony that lasted was built by a group of English Puritans, a group that believed in a different type of Protestant Christianity than most of England.[12] The people in this group who left England in 1620 are called the Pilgrims today.[13] The Pilgrims moved across the Atlantic Ocean on the Mayflower. Their first winter was very difficult. About fifty of the one hundred colonists died. In 1621, the Pilgrims became allies with the nearby Wampanoag group of Native Americans. They helped the Pilgrims to farm better and traded fur and other items with them.[14]

At first, the English struggled to make money from taking over the Caribbean. In 1604, they tried to find gold in Guiana but failed.[15] They also failed in St Lucia (1605) and Grenada (1609).[16] Colonists failed to grow tobacco in Barbados, but did well at growing sugar.[17]

Growth, 1630–1689

change
 
English overseas possessions in 1700

West Indies colonies

change

Because Barbados was successful, England built more colonies in St. Kitts, Antigua, Nevis, and Montserrat.[17] England also took over colonies that other empires had built, including Jamaica and the Caiman Islands from Spain[18] and the islands of the British Virgin Islands from the Netherlands.[source?]

These colonies grew sugar using the plantation plan and slaves.[19] Money from selling sugar made these colonies important to England.[20] Britain brought 3.5 million African slaves across the Atlantic Ocean, mostly from West Africa and Madagascar.[21] [22]

Establishment of the Thirteen Colonies

change

New England Colonies

change
 
Thirteen Colonies of North America:
Dark Red = New England colonies.
Bright Red = Middle Atlantic colonies.
Red-brown = Southern colonies.

More English groups built colonies in New England. In 1629, a group of Puritans led by John Winthrop built the Massachusetts Bay Colony. By 1635, around ten thousand English settlers lived between the Connecticut River and the Kennebec River.[23] After defeating the Pequot in the Pequot War, Puritans built the Connecticut Colony where the Pequots had lived.[24] The Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations was built by Roger Williams. Williams was a Puritan leader. He was not allowed to stay in the Massachusetts Bay Colony because he wanted to leave the Church of England.[25] It was difficult to grow food in New England, so people fished and traded to make money and get what they needed.[26]

Southern Colonies

change

In 1632, Cecil Calvert, 2nd Baron Baltimore founded the Province of Maryland to the north of Virginia.[27] Maryland and Virginia became known as the Chesapeake Colonies, and experienced similar immigration and economic activities.[28] Though Baltimore and his descendants intended for the colony to be a refuge for Catholics, it attracted mostly Protestant immigrants, many of whom scorned the Calvert family's policy of religious toleration.[29] In the mid-17th century, the Chesapeake Colonies, inspired by the success of slavery in Barbados, began the mass importation of African slaves. Though many early slaves eventually gained their freedom, after 1662 Virginia adopted policies that passed enslaved status from mother to child and granted slave owners near-total domination of their human property.[30]

640 miles (1,030 km) East-South-East of Cape Hatteras, in the Virginia Company's other former settlement, the Somers Isles, alias the Islands of Bermuda, where the spin-off Somers Isles Company still administered, the company and its shareholders in England only earned profits from the export of tobacco, placing them increasingly at odds with Bermudians for whom tobacco had become unprofitable to cultivate. As only those landowners who could attend the company's annual meetings in England were permitted to vote on company policy, the company worked to suppress the developing maritime economy of the colonists and to force the production of tobacco, which required unsustainable farming practices as more was required to be produced to make up for the diminished value.

As many of the class of moneyed businessmen who were adventurers in the company were aligned to the Parliamentary cause during the English Civil War, Bermuda was one of the colonies that sided with the Crown during the war, being the first to recognise Charles II after the execution of his father. With control of their Assembly and the militia and volunteer coastal artillery, the Royalist majority deposed the company-appointed Governor (by the 1630s, the company had ceased sending Governors to Bermuda and had instead appointed a succession of prominent Bermudians to the role, including religious Independent and Parliamentarian William Sayle) by force of arms and elected John Trimingham to replace him. Many of Bermuda's religious Independents, who had sided with Parliament, were forced into exile. Although some of the newer continental colonies settled largely by anti-Episcopalian Protestants sided with Parliament during the war, Virginia and other colonies like Bermuda supported the Crown and were subjected to the measures laid out in An Act for prohibiting Trade with the Barbadoes, Virginia, Bermuda and Antego until Parliament was able to force them to acknowledge its sovereignty.

Bermudian anger at the policies of the Somers Isles Company ultimately saw them take their complaints to the Crown after The Restoration, leading to the Crown revoking the Royal Charter of the Somers Isles Company and taking over direct administration of Bermuda in 1684. From that date, Bermudians abandoned agriculture, diversifying their maritime industry to occupy many niches of inter-colonial trade between North America and the West Indies. Bermudians limited landmass and high birth rate meant that a steady outflow from the colony contributed about 10,000 settlers to other colonies, notably the southern continental colonies (including Carolina Province, which was settled from Bermuda in 1670), as well as West Indian settlements, including the Providence Island colony in 1631, the Bahamas (settled by Eleutheran Adventurers, Parliament-allied Civil War exiles from Bermuda, under William Sayle in the 1640s), and the seasonal occupation of the Turks Islands from 1681.

Encouraged by the apparent weakness of Spanish rule in Florida, Barbadian planter John Colleton and seven other supporters of Charles II of England established the Province of Carolina in 1663.[31] Settlers in the Carolina Colony established two main population centers, with many Virginians settling in the north of the province and many English Barbadians settling in the southern port city of Charles Town.[32] In 1712, Carolina was divided into the crown colonies of North Carolina and South Carolina.[33] The colonies of Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina (as well as the Province of Georgia, which was established in 1732) became known as the Southern Colonies.[34][35]

Middle Colonies

change
 
James II established the Colony of New York and the Dominion of New England. He succeeded his brother as King of England in 1685 but was overthrown in the Glorious Revolution of 1688.

Beginning in 1609, Dutch traders had established fur trading posts on the Hudson River, Delaware River, and Connecticut River, ultimately creating the Dutch colony of New Netherland, with a capital at New Amsterdam.[36] In 1657, New Netherland expanded through conquest of New Sweden, a Swedish colony centered in the Delaware Valley.[37] Despite commercial success, New Netherland failed to attract the same level of settlement as the English colonies.[38] In 1664, during a series of wars between the English and Dutch, English soldier Richard Nicolls captured New Netherland.[39] The Dutch briefly regained control of parts of New Netherland in the Third Anglo-Dutch War, but surrendered its claim to the territory in the 1674 Treaty of Westminster, ending the Dutch colonial presence in North America.[40] In 1664, the Duke of York, later known as James II of England, was granted control of the English colonies north of the Delaware River. He created the Province of New York out of the former Dutch territory and renamed New Amsterdam as New York City.[41] He also created the provinces of West Jersey and East Jersey out of former Dutch land situated to the west of New York City, giving the territories to John Berkeley and George Carteret.[42] East Jersey and West Jersey would later be unified as the Province of New Jersey in 1702.[43]

Charles II rewarded William Penn, the son of distinguished Admiral William Penn, with the land situated between Maryland and the Jerseys. Penn named this land the Province of Pennsylvania.[44] Penn was also granted a lease to the Delaware Colony, which gained its own legislature in 1701.[45] A devout Quaker, Penn sought to create a haven of religious toleration in the New World.[45] Pennsylvania attracted Quakers and other settlers from across Europe, and the city of Philadelphia quickly emerged as a thriving port city.[46] With its fertile and cheap land, Pennsylvania became one of the most attractive destinations for immigrants in the late 17th century.[47] New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware became known as the Middle Colonies.[48]

Hudson's Bay Company

change

In 1670, Charles II incorporated by royal charter the Hudson's Bay Company (HBC), granting it a monopoly on the fur trade in the area known as Rupert's Land. Forts and trading posts established by the HBC were frequently the subject of attacks by the French.[49]

Darien scheme

change

In 1695, the Parliament of Scotland granted a charter to the Company of Scotland, which established a settlement in 1698 on the Isthmus of Panama. Besieged by neighbouring Spanish colonists of New Granada, and afflicted by malaria, the colony was abandoned two years later. The Darien scheme was a financial disaster for Scotland—a quarter of Scottish capital[50] was lost in the enterprise—and ended Scottish hopes of establishing its own overseas empire. The episode also had major political consequences, persuading the governments of both England and Scotland of the merits of a union of countries, rather than just crowns.[51] This occurred in 1707 with the Treaty of Union, establishing the Kingdom of Great Britain.

Expansion and conflict, 1689–1763

change

Settlement and expansion in North America

change

After succeeding his brother in 1685, King James II and his lieutenant, Edmund Andros, sought to assert the crown's authority over colonial affairs.[52] James was deposed by the new joint monarchy of William and Mary in the Glorious Revolution,[53] but William and Mary quickly reinstated many of the James's colonial policies, including the mercantilist Navigation Acts and the Board of Trade.[54] The Massachusetts Bay Colony, Plymouth Colony and the Province of Maine were incorporated into the Province of Massachusetts Bay, and New York and the Massachusetts Bay Colony were reorganized as royal colonies, with a governor appointed by the king.[55] Maryland, which had experienced a revolution against the Calvert family, also became a royal colony, though the Calverts retained much of their land and revenue in the colony.[56] Even those colonies that retained their charters or proprietors were forced to assent to much greater royal control than had existed before the 1690s.[57]

Between immigration, the importation of slaves, and natural population growth, the colonial population in British North America grew immensely in the 18th century. According to historian Alan Taylor, the population of the Thirteen Colonies (the British North American colonies which would eventually form the United States) stood at 1.5 million in 1750.[58] More than ninety percent of the colonists lived as farmers, though cities like Philadelphia, New York, and Boston flourished.[59] With the defeat of the Dutch and the imposition of the Navigation Acts, the British colonies in North America became part of the global British trading network. The colonists traded foodstuffs, wood, tobacco, and various other resources for Asian tea, West Indian coffee, and West Indian sugar, among other items.[60] Native Americans far from the Atlantic coast supplied the Atlantic market with beaver fur and deerskins, and sought to preserve their independence by maintaining a balance of power between the French and English.[61] By 1770, the economic output of the Thirteen Colonies made up forty percent of the gross domestic product of the British Empire.[62]

Prior to 1660, almost all immigrants to the English colonies of North America had migrated freely, though most paid for their passage by becoming indentured servants.[63] Improved economic conditions and an easing of religious persecution in Europe made it increasingly difficult to recruit labor to the colonies in the 17th and 18th centuries. Partly due to this shortage of free labor, the population of slaves in British North America grew dramatically between 1680 and 1750; the growth was driven by a mixture of forced immigration and the reproduction of slaves.[64] In the Southern Colonies, which relied most heavily on slave labor, the slaves supported vast plantation economies lorded over by increasingly wealthy elites.[65] By 1775, slaves made up one-fifth of the population of the Thirteen Colonies but less than ten percent of the population of the Middle Colonies and New England Colonies.[66] Though a smaller proportion of the English population migrated to British North America after 1700, the colonies attracted new immigrants from other European countries,[67] including Catholic settlers from Ireland[68] and Protestant Germans.[69] As the 18th century progressed, colonists began to settle far from the Atlantic coast. Pennsylvania, Virginia, Connecticut, and Maryland all lay claim to the land in the Ohio River valley, and the colonies engaged in a scramble to expand west.[70]

Following the 1684 revocation of the Somers Isles Company's Royal Charter, seafaring Bermudians established an inter-colonial trade network, with Charleston, South Carolina (settled from Bermuda in 1670 under William Sayle, and on the same latitude as Bermuda, although Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, is the nearest landfall to Bermuda) forming a continental hub for their trade (Bermuda itself produced only ships and seamen).[71] The widespread activities and settlement of Bermudians has resulted in many localities named after Bermuda dotting the map of North America.

Wars with the French and Spanish

change
 
After the end of the French and Indian War in 1763, North America was dominated by the British and Spanish Empires

The Glorious Revolution and the succession of William III, who had long resisted French hegemony as the Stadtholder of the Dutch Republic, ensured that England and its colonies would come into conflict with the French empire of Louis XIV after 1689.[72] Under the leadership of Samuel de Champlain, the French had established Quebec City on the St Lawrence River in 1608, and it became the center of French colony of Canada.[73] France and England engaged in a proxy war via Native American allies during and after the Nine Years' War, while the powerful Iroquois declared their neutrality.[74] War between France and England continued in Queen Anne's War, the North American component of the larger War of the Spanish Succession. In the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht, which ended the War of Spanish Succession, the British won possession of the French territories of Newfoundland and Acadia, the latter of which was renamed Nova Scotia.[26] In the 1730s, James Oglethorpe proposed that the area south of the Carolinas be colonized to provide a buffer against Spanish Florida, and he was part of a group of trustees that were granted temporary proprietorship over the Province of Georgia. Oglethorpe and his compatriots hoped to establish a utopian colony that banned slavery, but by 1750 the colony remained sparsely populated, and Georgia became a crown colony in 1752.[75]

In 1754, the Ohio Company started to build a fort at the confluence of the Allegheny River and the Monongahela River. A larger French force initially chased the Virginians away, but was forced to retreat after the Battle of Jumonville Glen.[76] After reports of the battle reached the French and British capitals, the Seven Years' War broke out in 1756; the North American component of this war is known as the French and Indian War.[77] After the Duke of Newcastle returned to power as Prime Minister in 1757, he and his foreign minister, William Pitt, devoted unprecedented financial resources to the transoceanic conflict.[78] The British won a series of victories after 1758, conquering much of New France by the end of 1760. Spain entered the war on France's side in 1762 and promptly lost several American territories to Britain.[79] The 1763 Treaty of Paris ended the war, and France surrendered almost all of the portion of New France to the east of the Mississippi River to the British. France separately ceded its lands west of the Mississippi River to Spain, and Spain ceded Florida to Britain.[80] With the newly acquired territories, the British created the provinces of East Florida, West Florida, and Quebec, all of which were placed under military governments.[81] In the Caribbean, Britain retained Grenada, St. Vincent, Dominica, and Tobago, but returned control of Martinique, Havana, and other colonial possessions to France or Spain.[82]

The Americans break away, 1763–1783

change
 
North America after the 1783 Treaty of Paris

The British subjects of North America believed the unwritten British constitution protected their rights and that the governmental system—with the House of Commons, the House of Lords, and the monarch sharing power—found an ideal balance among democracy, oligarchy, and tyranny.[83] However, the British were saddled with huge debts following the French and Indian War. As much of the British debt had been generated by the defense of the colonies, British leaders felt that the colonies should contribute more funds, and they began imposing taxes such as the Sugar Act of 1764.[84] Increased British control of the Thirteen Colonies upset the colonists and upended the notion many colonists held: that they were equal partners in the British Empire.[85] Meanwhile, seeking to avoid another expensive war with Native Americans, Britain issued the Royal Proclamation of 1763, which restricted settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains. However, it was effectively replaced five years later thanks to the Treaty of Fort Stanwix.[86] The Thirteen Colonies became increasingly divided between Patriots, opposed to parliamentary taxation without representation, and Loyalists, who supported the king. In the British colonies nearest to the Thirteen Colonies, however, protests were muted, as most colonists accepted the new taxes. These provinces had smaller populations, were largely dependent on the British military, and had less of a tradition of self-rule.[87]

At the Battles of Lexington and Concord in April 1775, the Patriots repulsed a British force charged with seizing militia arsenals.[88] The Second Continental Congress assembled in May 1775 and sought to coordinate armed resistance to Britain. It established an impromptu government that recruited soldiers and printed its own money. Announcing a permanent break with Britain, the delegates adopted a Declaration of Independence on 4 July 1776 for the United States of America.[89] The French formed a military alliance with the United States in 1778 following the British defeat at the Battle of Saratoga. Spain joined France in order to regain Gibraltar from Britain.[90] A combined Franco-American operation trapped a British invasion army at Yorktown, Virginia, forcing them to surrender in October 1781.[91] The surrender shocked Britain. The king wanted to keep fighting, but he lost control of Parliament and peace negotiations began.[92] In the 1783 Treaty of Paris, Britain ceded all of its North American territory south of the Great Lakes, except for the two Florida colonies, which were ceded to Spain.[93]

With their close ties of blood and trade with the continental colonies, especially Virginia and South Carolina, Bermudians leaned towards the rebels during the American War of Independence, supplying them with privateering ships and gunpowder, but the power of the Royal Navy on the surrounding Atlantic left no possibility of their joining the rebellion, and they eventually availed themselves of the opportunities of privateering against their former kinsmen. Although often mistaken for being in the West Indies, Bermuda is nearer to Canada (and was initially grouped within British North America, retaining close links especially with the Nova Scotia and Newfoundland until the continental colonies were confederated into Canada) than to the West Indies, and the nearest landfall is North Carolina. Following the independence of the United States, this would make Bermuda of supreme importance to Britain's strategic control of the region, including its ability to protect its shipping in the area and its ability to project its power against the Atlantic seaboard of the United States, as was to be shown during the American War of 1812.

Having defeated a combined Franco-Spanish naval force at the decisive 1782 Battle of the Saintes, Britain retained control of Gibraltar and all its pre-war Caribbean possessions except for Tobago.[94] Economically, the new nation became a major trading partner of Britain.

Second British Empire, 1783–1945

change
 
The British Empire in 1921

The loss of a large portion of British America defined the transition between the "first" and "second" empires, in which Britain shifted its attention away from the Americas to Asia, the Pacific, and later Africa.[95] Influenced by the ideas of Adam Smith, Britain also shifted away from mercantile ideals and began to prioritize the expansion of trade rather than territorial possessions.[96] During the nineteenth century, some observers described Britain as having an "unofficial" empire based on the export of goods and financial investments around the world, including the newly independent republics of Latin America. Though this unofficial empire did not require direct British political control, it often involved the use of gunboat diplomacy and military intervention to protect British investments and ensure the free flow of trade.[97]

From 1793 to 1815, Britain was almost constantly at war, first in the French Revolutionary Wars and then in the Napoleonic Wars.[98] During the wars, Britain took control of many French, Spanish, and Dutch Caribbean colonies.[99] Tensions between Britain and the United States escalated during the Napoleonic Wars, as the United States took advantage of its neutrality to undercut the British embargo on French-controlled ports, and Britain tried to cut off that American trade with France. The Royal Navy, which was desperately short of trained seamen and constantly losing deserters who sought better-paid work under less draconian discipline aboard American merchant vessels, boarded American ships to search for deserters, sometimes resulting in the Impressment of American sailors into the Royal Navy. The United States, at the same time, coveted the acquisition of Canada, which Britain could ill afford to lose as its naval and merchant fleets had been constructed largely from American timber before United States independence, and from Canadian timber thereafter. Taking advantage of Britain's absorption in its war with France, the United States began the American War of 1812 with the invasion of the Canadas, but the British Army mounted a successful defence with minimal regular forces, supported by militia and native allies, while the Royal Navy blockaded the United States of America's Atlantic coastline from Bermuda, strangling its merchant trade, and carried out amphibious raids including the Chesapeake Campaign with its Burning of Washington. As the United States failed to make any gains before British victory against France in 1814 freed British forces from Europe to be wielded against it, and as Britain had no aim in its war with its former colonies other than to defend its remaining continental territory, the war ended with the pre-war boundaries reaffirmed by the 1814 Treaty of Ghent, ensuring Canada's future would be separate from that of the United States.[100]

Following the final defeat of French Emperor Napoleon in 1815, Britain gained ownership of Trinidad, Tobago, British Guiana, and Saint Lucia, as well as other territories outside of the Western Hemisphere.[101] The Treaty of 1818 with the United States set a large portion of the Canada–United States border at the 49th parallel and also established a joint U.S.–British occupation of Oregon Country.[102] In the 1846 Oregon Treaty, the United States and Britain agreed to split Oregon Country along the 49th parallel north with the exception of Vancouver Island, which was assigned in its entirety to Britain.[103]

After warring throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries in both Europe and the Americas, the British and French reached a lasting peace after 1815. Britain would fight only one war (the Crimean War) against a European power during the remainder of the nineteenth century, and that war did not lead to territorial changes in the Americas.[104] However, the British Empire continued to engage in wars such as the First Opium War against China; it also put down rebellions such as the Indian Rebellion of 1857, the Canadian Rebellions of 1837–1838, and the Jamaican Morant Bay rebellion of 1865.[105] A strong abolition movement had emerged in the United Kingdom in the late-eighteenth century, and Britain abolished the slave trade in 1807.[106] In the mid-nineteenth century, the economies of the British Caribbean colonies would suffer as a result of the Slavery Abolition Act 1833, which abolished slavery throughout the British Empire, and the 1846 Sugar Duties Act, which ended preferential tariffs for sugar imports from the Caribbean.[107] To replace the labor of former slaves, British plantations on Trinidad and other parts of the Caribbean began to hire indentured servants from India and China.[108]

Establishing the Dominion of Canada

change

Despite its defeat in the American Revolutionary War and shift towards a new form of imperialism during the nineteenth century,[95][96] the British Empire retained numerous colonies in the Americas after 1783. During and after the American Revolutionary War, between 40,000 and 100,000 defeated Loyalists migrated from the United States to Canada.[109] The 14,000 Loyalists who went to the Saint John and Saint Croix river valleys, then part of Nova Scotia, felt too far removed from the provincial government in Halifax, so London split off New Brunswick as a separate colony in 1784.[110] The Constitutional Act of 1791 created the provinces of Upper Canada (mainly English-speaking) and Lower Canada (mainly French-speaking) to defuse tensions between the French and British communities, and implemented governmental systems similar to those employed in Britain, with the intention of asserting imperial authority and not allowing the sort of popular control of government that was perceived to have led to the American Revolution.[111]

The British also expanded their mercantile interests in the North Pacific. Spain and Britain had become rivals in the area which came to a head with the Nootka Crisis in 1789. Both sides mobilised for war, and Spain counted on France for support but when France refused, Spain had to back down and capitulated to British terms leading to the Nootka Convention. The outcome of the crisis was a humiliation for Spain and a triumph for Britain, for the former had practically renounced all sovereignty on the North Pacific coast.[112] This opened the way to British expansion in that area, and a number of expeditions took place; firstly a naval expedition led by George Vancouver which explored the inlets around the Pacific NorthWest, particularly around Vancouver Island.[113] On land, expeditions took place hoping for a discovery of a practicable river route to the Pacific for the extension of the North American fur trade (the North West Company). Sir Alexander Mackenzie led the first starting out in 1792, and a year a later he became the first European to reach the Pacific overland north of the Rio Grande reaching the ocean near present-day Bella Coola. This preceded the Lewis and Clark Expedition by twelve years. Shortly thereafter, Mackenzie's companion, John Finlay, founded the first permanent European settlement in British Columbia, Fort St. John. The North West Company sought further explorations firstly by David Thompson, starting in 1797, and later by Simon Fraser. More expedition took place in the early 1800s and pushed into the wilderness territories of the Rocky Mountains and Interior Plateau and all the way to the Strait of Georgia on the Pacific Coast expanding British North America Westward.[114]

In 1815, Lieutenant-General Sir George Prevost was Captain-General and Governor-in-Chief in and over the Provinces of Upper-Canada, Lower-Canada, Nova-Scotia, and New~Brunswick, and their several Dependencies, Vice-Admiral of the same, Lieutenant-General and Commander of all His Majesty's Forces in the said Provinces of Lower Canada and Upper-Canada, Nova-Scotia and New-Brunswick, and their several Dependencies, and in the islands of Newfoundland, Prince Edward, Cape Breton and the Bermudas, &c. &c. &c. Beneath Prevost, the staff of the British Army in the Provinces of Nova-Scotia, New-Brunswick, and their Dependencies, including the Islands of Newfoundland, Cape Breton, Prince Edward and Bermuda were under the Command of Lieutenant-General Sir John Coape Sherbrooke. Below Sherbrooke, the Bermuda Garrison was under the immediate control of the Lieutenant-Governor of Bermuda, Major-General George Horsford (although the Lieutenant-Governor of Bermuda was eventually restored to a full civil Governorship, in his military role as Commander-in-Chief of Bermuda he remained subordinate to the Commander-in-Chief in Halifax, and naval and ecclesiastic links between Bermuda the Maritimes also remained; The military links were severed by Canadian confederation at the end of the 1860s, which resulted in the removal of the British Army from Canada and its Commander-in-Chief from Halifax when the Canadian Government took responsibility for the defence of Canada; The naval links remained until the Royal Navy withdrew from Halifax in 1905, handing its dockyard there over to the Royal Canadian Navy; The established Church of England in Bermuda, within which the Governor held office as Ordinary, remained linked to the colony of Newfoundland under the same Bishop until 1919).[115]

In response to the Rebellions of 1837–1838,[111] Britain passed the Act of Union in 1840, which united Upper Canada and Lower Canada into the Province of Canada. Responsible government was first granted to Nova Scotia in 1848, and was soon extended to the other British North American colonies. With the passage of the British North America Act, 1867 by the British Parliament, Upper and Lower Canada, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia were formed into the confederation of Canada.[116] Rupert's Land (which was divided into Manitoba and the Northwest Territories), British Columbia, and Prince Edward Island joined Canada by the end of 1873, but Newfoundland would not join Canada until 1949.[source?] Like other British dominions such as Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa, Canada enjoyed autonomy over its domestic affairs but recognized the British monarch as head of state and cooperated closely with Britain on defense issues.[117] After the passage of the 1931 Statute of Westminster,[118] Canada and other dominions were fully independent of British legislative control; they could nullify British laws and Britain could no longer pass laws for them without their consent.[119]

United States independence, and the closure of its ports to British trade, combined with growing peace in the region which reduced the risk to shipping (resulting in smaller evasive merchantmen, such as those that Bermudian shipbuilders turned out, losing favour to larger clippers), and the advent of metal hulls and steam engines, were to slowly strangle Bermuda's maritime economy, while its newfound importance as a Royal Navy and British Army base from which the North America and West Indies Station could be controlled meant increasing interest from the British Government in its governance.

Bermuda was grouped with British North America, especially Nova Scotia and Newfoundland (its closest British neighbours), following United States Independence. When war with France followed the French Revolution, a Royal Naval Dockyard was established at Bermuda in 1795, which was to alternate with Royal Naval Dockyard, Halifax (Bermuda during the summers and Halifax during the winters) as the Royal Navy headquarters and main base for the River St. Lawrence and Coast of America Station (which was to become the North America Station in 1813, the North America and Lakes of Canada Station in 1816, the North America and Newfoundland Station in 1821, the North America and West Indies Station about 1820, and finally the America and West Indies Station from 1915 to 1956) before becoming the year-round headquarters and main base from about 1818.

The regular army garrison (established in 1701 but withdrawn in 1784) was re-established in 1794 and grew during the Nineteenth Century to be one of the British Army's largest, relative to Bermuda's size. The blockade of the Atlantic seaboard ports of the United States and the Chesapeake Campaign (including the Burning of Washington) were orchestrated from Bermuda during the American War of 1812. Preparations for similar operations were carried out in Bermuda when the Trent Affair nearly brought Britain to war with the United States during the American Civil War (Bermuda had already been serving as the primary tran-shipment point for British and European manufactured arms which were smuggled into Confederate ports, especially Charleston, South Carolina, by blockade runners; cotton was brought out from the same ports by the blockade runners to be traded at Bermuda for the war materiel), and Bermuda played important roles (as a naval base, trans-Atlantic convoy forming-up point, as a connecting point in the Cable and Wireless Nova Scotia-to-British West Indies submarine telegraph cable, as a wireless station, and from the 1930s as a site for airbases used as a staging point for trans-Atlantic flights and for operating anti-submarine air patrols over the North Atlantic) in the Atlantic theatre of the First World War and in the Battle of the Atlantic during the Second World War, when the already existing Royal Navy, British Army, and Royal Air Force bases were joined by a Royal Canadian Navy base and naval and air bases of the allied United States. It remained a vital air and naval base during the Cold War, with American and Canadian bases existing alongside the British ones from the Second World War until 1995.

British Honduras and Falkland Islands

change

In the early 17th century, English sailors had begun cutting logwood in parts of coastal Central America over which the Spanish exercised little control. By the early 18th century, a small British settlement had been established on the Belize River, though the Spanish refused to recognize British control over the region and frequently evicted British settlers. In the 1783 Treaty of Paris and the 1786 Convention of London, Spain gave Britain the right to cut logwood and mahogany in the area between the Hondo River and the Belize River, but Spain retained sovereignty over this area. Following the 1850 Clayton–Bulwer Treaty with the United States, Britain agreed to evacuate its settlers from the Bay Islands and the Mosquito Coast, but it retained control of the settlement on the Belize River. In 1862, Britain established the crown colony of the British Honduras at this location.[120]

The British first established a presence on the Falkland Islands in 1765 but were compelled to withdraw for economic reasons related to the American War of Independence in 1774.[121] The islands continued to be used by British sealers and whalers, although the settlement of Port Egmont was destroyed by the Spanish in 1780. Argentina attempted to establish a colony in the ruins of the former Spanish settlement of Puerto Soledad, which ended with the British return in 1833. The British governed the uninhabited South Georgia Island, which had been claimed by Captain James Cook in 1775, as a dependency of the Falkland Islands.[122]

Decolonization and overseas territories, 1945–present

change

Successful independence movements

change
 
The Commonwealth of Nations consists of former territories of the British Empire in the Americas and elsewhere

With the onset of the Cold War in the late 1940s, the British government began to assemble plans for the independence of the empire's colonies in Africa, Asia, and the Americas. British authorities initially planned for a three-decades-long process in which each colony would develop a self-governing and democratic parliament, but unrest and fears of Communist infiltration in the colonies encouraged the British to speed up the move towards self-governance.[123] Compared to other European empires, which experienced wars of independence such as the Algerian War and the Portuguese Colonial War, the British post-war process of decolonization in the Caribbean was relatively peaceful.[124]

In an attempt to unite its Caribbean colonies, Britain established the West Indies Federation in 1958. The federation collapsed following the loss of its two largest members, Jamaica and Trinidad, each of which attained independence in 1962; Trinidad formed a union with Tobago to become the country of Trinidad and Tobago.[125] The eastern Caribbean islands, as well as the Bahamas, gained independence in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s.[125] Guyana achieved independence in 1966. Britain's last colony on the American mainland, British Honduras, became a self-governing colony in 1964 and was renamed Belize in 1973, achieving full independence in 1981. A dispute with Guatemala over claims to Belize was left unresolved.[126]

Remaining territories

change

Though many of the Caribbean territories of the British Empire gained independence, Anguilla and the Turks and Caicos Islands opted to revert to British rule after they had already started on the path to independence.[127] The British Virgin Islands, Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, Montserrat, and the Falkland Islands also remain under the jurisdiction of Britain.[128] In 1982, Britain defeated Argentina in the Falklands War, an undeclared war in which Argentina attempted to seize control of the Falkland Islands.[129] In 1983, the British Nationality Act 1981 renamed the existing British colonies as "British dependent territories".[a]

Historically, colonials shared the same citizenship (although Magna Carta had effectively created English citizenship, citizens were still termed subjects of the King of England or English subjects. With the union of the kingdoms of England and Scotland, this was replaced with British subject, which encompassed citizens throughout the sovereign territory of the British government, including the colonies) as Britons. Although historically all British subjects had the right to vote for candidates, or to themselves stand for election, to the House of Commons (providing that they were male, prior to women's suffrage, and met the property qualification, when it applied). The British government (as with the Government of the Kingdom of England before it) has never assigned seats in the House of Commons to any colony, effectively disenfranchising colonials at the sovereign level of their government. There has also never been a peer in the House of Lords representing any colony. Colonials were therefore not consulted, or required to give their consent, to a series of acts that passed by the Parliament of the United Kingdom between 1968 and 1982, which were to limit their rights and ultimately change their citizenship.

When several colonies were elevated before the Second World War to dominion status, collectively forming the old British Commonwealth (as distinct from the United Kingdom and its dependent colonies), their citizens remained British subjects, and in theory, any British subject born anywhere in the world had the same basic right to enter, reside, and work in the United Kingdom as a British subject born in the United Kingdom whose parents were also both British subjects born in the United Kingdom (although many governmental policies and practices acted to thwart the free exercise of these right by various demographic groups of colonials, including Greek Cypriots).

When the dominions and an increasing number of colonies began choosing complete independence from the United Kingdom after the Second World War, the Commonwealth was transformed into a community of independent nations, each recognising the British monarch as their own head of state (creating separate monarchies with the same person occupying all of the separate Thrones; the exception being republican India). British subject was replaced by the British Nationality Act 1948 with citizen of the United Kingdom and colonies for the residents of the United Kingdom and its colonies, as well as the Crown dependencies. however, as it was desired to retain free movement for all Commonwealth citizens throughout the Commonwealth, British subject was retained as a blanket nationality shared by citizens of the United Kingdom and colonies as well as the citizens of the various other Commonwealth realms.

The inflow of coloured people to the United Kingdom during the 1940s and 1950s from both remaining colonies and newly independent Commonwealth nations was responded to with a racist backlash that led to the passing of the Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962, which restricted the rights of Commonwealth nationals to enter, reside and work in the United Kingdom. This act also allowed certain colonials (primarily ethnic Indians in African colonies) to retain citizenship of the United Kingdom and colonies if their colonies became independent, intended as a measure to ensure these persons did not become stateless if they were denied the citizenship of their newly independent nation.

Many ethnic-Indians did find themselves marginalised in newly independent nations (notably Kenya) and relocated to the United Kingdom, in response to which the Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1968 was rapidly passed, stripping all British subjects (including citizens of the United Kingdom and colonies) who were not born in the United Kingdom, and who did not have a citizen of the United Kingdom and colonies parent born in the United Kingdom or some other qualification (such as existing residence status), of the rights to freely enter, reside and work in the United Kingdom.

This was followed by the Immigration Act 1971, which effectively divided citizens of the United Kingdom and colonies into two types, although their citizenship remained the same: Those from the United Kingdom itself, who retained the rights of free entry, abode, and work in the United Kingdom; and those born in the colonies (or in foreign countries to British colonial parents), from whom those rights were denied.

The British Nationality Act 1981, which entered into force on 1 January 1983,[131] abolished British subject status, and stripped colonials of their full British citizen of the United Kingdom and colonies, replacing it with British dependent territories citizenship, which entailed no right of abode or to work anywhere (other categories with even fewer rights were created at the same time, including British overseas citizen for former citizens of the United Kingdom and colonies born in ex-colonies).

The exceptions were the Gibraltarians (permitted to retain British nationality in order to retain citizenship of the European Union) and the Falkland Islanders, who were permitted to retain the same new British citizenship that became the default citizenship for those from the United Kingdom and the Crown dependencies. As the act was widely understood to have been passed in preparation for the 1997 handover of Hong Kong to the People's Republic of China (in order to prevent ethnic-Chinese British nationals from migrating to the United Kingdom), and given the history of neglect and racism those colonies with sizeable non-European (to use the British government's parlance) populations had endured from the British government since the end of Empire, the application of the act only to those colonies in which the citizenship was changed to British dependent territories citizenship has been perceived as a particularly egregious example of the racism of the British government.

The stripping of birth rights from at least some of the colonial CUKCs in 1968 and 1971, and the change of their citizenships in 1983, actually violated the rights granted them by royal charters at the founding of the colonies. Bermuda (fully The Somers Isles or Islands of Bermuda), by example, had been settled by the London Company (which had been in occupation of the archipelago since the 1609 wreck of the Sea Venture) in 1612, when it received its Third Royal Charter from King James I, amending the boundaries of the First Colony of Virginia far enough across the Atlantic to include Bermuda. The citizenship rights guaranteed to settlers by King James I in the original royal charter of the 10 April 1606, thereby applied to Bermudians:

Alsoe wee doe, for us, our heires and successors, declare by theise presentes that all and everie the parsons being our subjects which shall dwell and inhabit within everie or anie of the saide severall Colonies and plantacions and everie of theire children which shall happen to be borne within the limitts and precincts of the said severall Colonies and plantacions shall have and enjoy all liberties, franchises and immunites within anie of our other dominions to all intents and purposes as if they had been abiding and borne within this our realme of Englande or anie other of our saide dominions.

[132]

These rights were confirmed in the royal charter granted to the London Company's spin-off, the Company of the City of London for the Plantacion of The Somers Isles, in 1615 on Bermuda being separated from Virginia:

And wee doe for vs our heires and successors declare by these Pnts, that all and euery persons being our subjects which shall goe and inhabite wthin the said Somer Ilandes and every of their children and posterity which shall happen to bee borne within the limits thereof shall haue and enjoy all libertyes franchesies and immunities of free denizens and natural subjectes within any of our dominions to all intents and purposes, as if they had beene abiding and borne wthin this our Kingdome of England or in any other of our Dominions[133]

In regards to former CUKCs of Saint Helena, Lord Beaumont of Whitley in the House of Lords debate on the British Overseas Territories Bill on the 10 July 2001, stated:

Citizenship was granted irrevocably by Charles I. It was taken away, quite wrongly, by Parliament in surrender to the largely racist opposition to immigration at the time.[134]

Some Conservative Party backbenchers stated that it was the unpublished intention of the Conservative British government to return to a single citizenship for the United Kingdom and all of the remaining territories once Hong Kong had been handed over to China. Whether this was so will never be known as by 1997 the Labour Party was in government. The Labour Party had declared prior to the election that the colonies had been ill-treated by the British Nationality Act 1981, and it had made a promise to return to a single citizenship for the United Kingdom and the remaining territories part of its election manifesto. Other matters took precedence, however, and this commitment was not acted upon during Labour's first term in government. The House of Lords, in which many former colonial governors sat, lost patience and tabled and passed its own bill, then handed it down to the House of Commons to confirm. As a result, the British dependent territories were renamed the British overseas territories in 2002 (the term dependent territory had caused much ire in the former colonies, such as well-heeled Bermuda that had been largely self-reliant and self-governed for nearly four centuries, as it implied not only that they were other than British, but that their relationship to Britain and to real British people was both inferior and parasitic).[135][136][137]

At the same time, although Labour had promised a return to a single citizenship for the United Kingdom, Crown dependencies, and all remaining territories, British dependent territories citizenship, renamed British overseas territories citizenship, remained the default citizenship for the territories, other than the Falkland Islands and Gibraltar (for which British citizenship is still the default citizenship). The bars to residence and work in the United Kingdom that had been raised against holders of British dependent territories citizenship by The British Nationality Act 1981 were, however, removed, and British citizenship was made attainable by simply obtaining a second British passport with the citizenship recorded as British citizen (requiring a change to passport legislation as prior to 2002, it had been illegal to possess two British passports).[138]

Prior to 2002, all British passports obtained in a British dependent territory were of a design modified from those issued in the United Kingdom, lacking the European Union name on the front cover, having the name of the specific territorial government noted on the front cover below "British passport", and having the request on the inside of the front cover normally issued by the secretary of state on behalf of the Queen instead issued by the governor of the territory on behalf of the Queen. Although this design made it easier for United Kingdom Border Control to distinguish a colonial from a 'real' British citizen, these passports were issued within the territory to the holder of any type of British citizenship with the appropriate citizenship stamped inside. The normal British passports issued in the United Kingdom and by British consulates in Commonwealth and foreign countries were similarly issued to holders of any type of British citizenship with the appropriate citizenship, or citizenships, stamped inside. From 2002, the thenceforth local governments of the British overseas territories in which British overseas territories citizenship was the default citizenship were no longer allowed to issue or replace any British passport except the type for their own territory only with British overseas territories citizen recorded inside (and a stamp from the local government showing the holder has legal status as a local (in Bermuda, by example, the stamp records "the holder is registered as a Bermudian"), as neither British dependent territories citizenship nor British overseas territories citizenship actually entitles the holder to any more rights in any territory than in the United Kingdom, simply serving to enable colonials to be distinguished from real British people for the benefit of United Kingdom Border Control.

Since 2002, only the United Kingdom Government has issued normal British passports with the citizenship stamped as British citizen. Since June 2016, only the Passport Office in the United Kingdom is permitted to issue any type of British passport. Local governments of territories can still accept passport applications, but must forward them to the Passport Office. This means that the territorial pattern of British passport is no longer available, with all passports issued since then being of the standard type issued in the United Kingdom, with the appropriate type of British citizenship recorded inside; a problem for Bermudians as they have always enjoyed freer entry into the United States than other British citizens, but the United States had updated its entry requirements (prior to the 2001 terrorist attacks on New York City and Washington, D.C., Bermudians did not need a passport to enter the US, and Americans did not need a passport to enter Bermuda. Since then, anyone entering the US, including US citizens, must present a passport) to specify that, in order to be admitted as a Bermudian the passport must be of the territorial type specific to Bermuda, with the country code inside being that used for Bermuda as distinct from other parts of the British Realm, with the citizenship stamped as British dependent territories citizenship or British overseas territories citizenship, and the stamp from Bermuda Immigration showing the holder has Bermudian status. From the point of view of Bermuda Immigration, only the stamp showing the holder has Bermudian status indicates the holder is Bermudian, and that can be entered into any type of British passport with any type of British citizenship recorded, so the United States requirements are more stringent than Bermuda's, and impossible to meet with any British passport issued to a Bermudian since the end of June 2016.[139][140][141][142]

The eleven inhabited territories are self-governing to varying degrees and are reliant on the UK for foreign relations and defence.[143] Most former British colonies and protectorates are among the 52 member states of the Commonwealth of Nations, a non-political, voluntary association of equal members, comprising a population of around 2.2 billion people.[144] Fifteen Commonwealth realms, including Canada and several countries in the Caribbean, voluntarily continue to share the British monarch, King Charles III, as their head of state.[145][146]

List of colonies

change

Former North American colonies

change

Canadian territories

change

These colonies and territories (known, together with Bermuda, as British North America following independence of the United States of America) were confederated to form modern Canada between 1867 and 1873 unless otherwise noted:

Thirteen Colonies

change

The Thirteen Colonies, which became the original states of the United States following the 1781 ratification of the Articles of Confederation:

Other North American colonies

change

These colonies were acquired in 1763 and ceded to Spain in 1783:

  • Province of East Florida (from Spain, retroceded to Spain)
  • Province of West Florida (from France as part of eastern French Louisiana, ceded to Spain)

Former colonies in the Caribbean and South America

change

These present-day countries formed part of the British West Indies prior to gaining independence during the 20th century:

Current territories

change

These British Overseas Territories in the Americas remain under the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom:

change
  1. Schedule 6 of the British Nationality Act 1981[130] reclassified the remaining self-governing colonies (those with their own elected legislatures and a degree of autonomy, such as Bermuda) and Crown colonies (those without elected legislatures, which were governed entirely by British Government-appointed Governors with advisory councils, such as Hong Kong) as "British Dependent Territories".

References

change
  1. Richter, Daniel K. (2011). Before the Revolution: America's ancient pasts. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press. pp. 98-100. ISBN 978-0-674-07236-7.
  2. Richter, Daniel K. (2011). Before the Revolution: America's ancient pasts. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press. pp. 100-102. ISBN 978-0-674-07236-7.
  3. Richter, Daniel K. (2011). Before the Revolution: America's ancient pasts. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press. pp. 103-107. ISBN 978-0-674-07236-7.
  4. James (1997), p. 5
  5. Richter, Daniel K. (2011). Before the Revolution: America's ancient pasts. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press. pp. 112. ISBN 978-0-674-07236-7.
  6. "English Colonization Begins". Digital History. University of Houston.
  7. Richter 2011, pp. 113–115. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  8. Richter 2011, pp. 116–117. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  9. "Bermuda - History and Heritage". Smithsonian.com. Retrieved 6 September 2019.
  10. Butler, James Davie (1896). "British Convicts Shipped to American Colonies". The American Historical Review. 2 (1): 12–33. doi:10.2307/1833611. JSTOR 1833611.
  11. Thomas Keneally, The Commonwealth of Thieves, Random House Publishing, Sydney, 2005.[page needed]
  12. Richter, Daniel K. (2011). Before the Revolution: America's ancient pasts. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press. pp. 178-179. ISBN 978-0-674-07236-7.
  13. Richter, Daniel K. (2011). Before the Revolution: America's ancient pasts. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press. pp. 152-157. ISBN 978-0-674-07236-7.
  14. Richter, Daniel K. (2011). Before the Revolution: America's ancient pasts. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press. pp. 153-157. ISBN 978-0-674-07236-7.
  15. Canny (1998), p. 71
  16. Canny (1998), p. 221
  17. 17.0 17.1 James (1997), p. 17
  18. James (1997), pp. 30–31
  19. Lloyd (1996), pp. 22–23.
  20. Hilary Beckles, "The 'Hub of Empire': The Caribbean and Britain in the Seventeenth Century", The Oxford History of the British Empire: Volume 1 The Origins of Empire, ed. by Nicholas Canny (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 222.
  21. Ferguson (2004), p. 62
  22. James (1997), p. 24
  23. Richter 2011, pp. 157–159. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  24. Richter 2011, pp. 161–167. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  25. Richter 2011, pp. 196–197. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  26. 26.0 26.1 Taylor (2016), p. 19
  27. Richter 2011, pp. 262–263. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  28. Richter 2011, pp. 203–204. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  29. Richter 2011, pp. 303–304. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  30. Richter 2011, p. 272. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  31. Richter 2011, pp. 236–238. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  32. Richter 2011, p. 319. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  33. Hugh T. Lefler and William S. Powell (1973). Colonial North Carolina: A History. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York. p. 80. ISBN 9780684135366.
  34. "The Southern Colonies [ushistory.org]". www.ushistory.org. Retrieved 15 September 2020.
  35. "Settling the Southern Colonies | Boundless US History". courses.lumenlearning.com. Retrieved 15 September 2020.
  36. Richter 2011, pp. 138–140. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  37. Richter 2011, p. 262. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  38. Richter 2011, pp. 215–217. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  39. Richter 2011, pp. 248–249. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  40. Richter 2011, p. 261. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  41. Richter 2011, pp. 247–249. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  42. Richter 2011, pp. 249–251. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  43. Richter 2011, pp. 252–253. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  44. Richter 2011, p. 373. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  45. 45.0 45.1 Richter 2011, p. 251. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  46. Richter 2011, p. 357. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  47. Richter 2011, p. 358. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  48. McCusker, John J.; Menard, Russell R. (1991). The Economy of British America, 1607-1789. University of North Carolina Press. JSTOR 10.5149/9781469600000_mccusker.
  49. Bucker (2008), p. 25
  50. Magnusson (2003), p. 531
  51. Macaulay (1848), p. 509
  52. Richter 2011, pp. 290–294. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  53. Richter 2011, pp. 300–301. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  54. Richter 2011, pp. 310–311, 328. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  55. Richter 2011, pp. 314–315. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  56. Richter 2011, p. 315. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  57. Richter 2011, pp. 315–316. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  58. Taylor (2016), p. 20
  59. Taylor (2016), p. 23
  60. Richter 2011, pp. 329–330. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  61. Richter 2011, pp. 332–336. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  62. Taylor (2016), p. 25
  63. James (1997), pp. 10–11
  64. Richter 2011, pp. 346–347. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  65. Richter 2011, pp. 346–347, 351–352. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  66. Taylor (2016), p. 21
  67. Taylor (2016), pp. 18-19
  68. Richter 2011, p. 360. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  69. Richter 2011, p. 362. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  70. Richter 2011, pp. 373–374. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  71. Jarvis, Michael (2010). In the Eye of All Trade. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. pp. 386–391. ISBN 9780807872840.
  72. Richter 2011, pp. 296–298. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  73. Richter 2011, pp. 130–135. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  74. Richter 2011, pp. 317–318. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  75. Richter 2011, pp. 358–359. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  76. Richter 2011, pp. 385–387. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  77. Richter 2011, pp. 388–389. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  78. Taylor (2016), p. 45
  79. Richter 2011, pp. 396–398. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  80. Richter 2011, pp. 406–407. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  81. Richter 2011, pp. 407–409. sfn error: multiple targets (8×): CITEREFRichter2011 (help)
  82. James (1997), p. 76
  83. Taylor (2016), pp. 31-35
  84. Taylor (2016), pp. 51-53, 94–96
  85. Taylor (2016), pp. 51-52
  86. Taylor (2016), pp. 60-61
  87. Taylor (2016), pp. 102-103, 137-138.
  88. Taylor (2016), pp. 132-133
  89. Taylor (2016), pp. pp. 139-141, 160-161
  90. Taylor (2016), pp. 187-191
  91. Taylor (2016), pp. 293-295
  92. Taylor (2016), pp. 295-297
  93. Taylor (2016), pp. 306-308
  94. James (1997), pp. 80–82
  95. 95.0 95.1 Canny (1998), p. 92
  96. 96.0 96.1 James (1997), pp. 119–121, 165
  97. James (1997), pp. 173–174, 177
  98. James (1997), p. 151
  99. James (1997), p. 154
  100. Jeremy Black, The War of 1812 in the Age of Napoleon (2009) pp 204–37.
  101. James (1997), p. 165
  102. "James Monroe: Foreign Affairs". Miller Center of Public Affairs, University of Virginia. 4 October 2016. Retrieved 25 February 2017.
  103. Noakes, Taylor C. "Oregon Treaty". The Canadian Encyclopedia.
  104. James (1997), pp. 179–182
  105. James (1997), pp. 190, 193
  106. James (1997), pp. 185–186
  107. James (1997), pp. 171–172
  108. James (1997), p. 188
  109. Zolberg (2006), p. 496
  110. Kelley & Trebilcock (2010), p. 43
  111. 111.0 111.1 Smith (1998), p. 28
  112. Blackmar, Frank Wilson (1891). Spanish Institutions of the Southwest Issue 10 of Johns Hopkins University studies in historical and political science. Hopkins Press. p. 335.
  113. Pethick, Derek (1980). The Nootka Connection: Europe and the Northwest Coast 1790–1795. Vancouver: Douglas & McIntyre. p. 18. ISBN 978-0-88894-279-1.
  114. Innis, Harold A (2001) [1930]. The Fur Trade in Canada: An Introduction to Canadian Economic History (reprint ed.). Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto Press. ISBN 978-0-8020-8196-4.
  115. The Quebec Almanack, 1815
  116. Porter (1998), p. 187
  117. James (1997), pp. 311–312, 341
  118. Rhodes, Wanna & Weller (2009), pp. 5–15
  119. Turpin & Tomkins, p. 48
  120. Bolland, Nigel. "Belize: Historical Setting". In A Country Study: Belize (Tim Merrill, editor). Library of Congress Federal Research Division (January 1992).
  121. Gibran, Daniel (1998). The Falklands War: Britain Versus the Past in the South Atlantic. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, Inc. pp. 26–27. ISBN 978-0-7864-0406-3.
  122. R.K. Headland, The Island of South Georgia, Cambridge University Press, 1984. ISBN 0-521-25274-1
  123. James (1997), p. 538–539
  124. James (1997), pp. 588–589
  125. 125.0 125.1 Knight & Palmer (1989), pp. 14–15.
  126. Lloyd (1996), pp. 401, 427–29.
  127. Clegg (2005), p. 128.
  128. James (1997), p. 622
  129. James (1997), pp. 624–626
  130. "British Nationality Act 1981, Schedule 6". Archived from the original on 1 April 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2019.
  131. "The British Nationality Act 1981 (Commencement) Order 1982". Archived from the original on 1 April 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2019.
  132. "The Project Gutenburg ebook of The Three Charters of the Virginia Company of London, by Samuel M. Bemiss". www.gutenberg.org.
  133. Letters Patent of King James I, 1615. Memorials of the Discovery and Early Settlement of The Bermudas or Somers Islands, Volume 1, by Lieutenant-General Sir John Henry Lefroy, Royal Artillery, Governor and Commander-in-Chief of Bermuda 1871–1877. The Bermuda Memorials Edition, 1981. The Bermuda Historical Society and The Bermuda National Trust (First Edition, London, 1877)
  134. "British Overseas Territories Bill [H.L.]". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). 10 July 2001.
  135. House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Overseas Territories Report[broken anchor], pp. 145–47
  136. Warwick, Professor John (24 September 2007). "Professor John Warwick: Race and the development of Immigration policy during the 20th century".
  137. "Windrush scandal shows how 'Britishness' stinks". Socialist Worker. 1 May 2018.
  138. British Overseas Territories Bill [H.L.]; House of Lords Debate, 10 July 2001. Volume 626, cc1014-37. UK Parliament website
  139. "U.S. immigration policy related to Bermuda Passports , website of the United States Consulate General in Bermuda".
  140. Smith, Tim (12 August 2019). "Government working to resolve passport issues". www.royalgazette.com.
  141. "A British passport to prejudice". Socialist Worker. 15 May 2018.
  142. "Illegitimate children denied British citizenship by 'archaic' law". New Internationalist. 12 November 2018.
  143. House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Overseas Territories Report, pp. 146,153[broken anchor]
  144. The Commonwealth – About Us Archived 27 September 2013 at the Wayback Machine; Online September 2014
  145. "Head of the Commonwealth". Commonwealth Secretariat. Archived from the original on 6 July 2010. Retrieved 9 October 2010.
  146. Jowett, A. J.; Findlay, A. M.; Li, F. L.; Skeldon, R. (July 1995). "The British who are not British and the immigration policies that are not: the case of Hong Kong". Applied Geography (Sevenoaks, England). 15 (3): 245–265. Bibcode:1995AppGe..15..245J. doi:10.1016/0143-6228(95)00009-s. PMID 12291184.

Works cited

change

Other books and articles

change

Historiography

change

Other websites

change