Archive
Archives

On the matter of Steppenwolf...

change

Regarding your edit to the said article...even if the song has appeared in many movies, I believe one is sufficient for the article. I don't see a problem with having all the movies listed, but I also don't see the problem with having just one article listed. I do think it's an important part of the article, because it's probably the bands only claim to fame. Thanks, --Isis(talk) 20:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay. I know nothing about this band, so just...disregard me...--Isis(talk) 20:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thankyou

change
    Dear CPacker thank you for supporting my recent RfA which closed as successful. I very much appreciate your support and I will do my best for the community in my new administrator role. Thanks again, FSM Noodly?  

Pen

change

I am the botmaster of User:DragonBot and reverted an edit caused by someone's vandalism in vi.wiki that my bot propogated. You almost screwed up by re-reverting my edit. Fortunately User:SilvonenBot corrected ur edit before some other bot propogated it to all wikis. Please be more careful when reverting bot edit reverts. --Jacob.jose (talk) 01:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nudity

change

You commented at the voting discussion for Wikipedia:Proposed_very_good_articles#Nudity_2. Another user has expressed concerns that there are some sourcing issues with the article that need to be addressed before this is passed as a very good article. Would you mind reviewing the discussion at the vote page and adding your input (or help to find sources, if you can)? Thank you, Either way (talk) 22:02, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quick deletion of Template:Natural disasters by year

change
 

The page you wrote, Template:Natural disasters by year, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Hazard-SJ Talk 21:33, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quick deletion of Template:Green Bay Packers roster

change
 

The page you wrote, Template:Green Bay Packers roster, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 00:03, 16 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quick deletion of Template:Okstub

change
 

The page you wrote, Template:Okstub, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 04:38, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quick deletion of Template:Demonstrate template

change
 

The page you wrote, Template:Demonstrate template, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 04:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Call me please Caleb

change

John at 800-455-3393 re: i would like to use some of your photos vis a vis accreditation

RfD nomination of User:CPacker/WikiProject Oklahoma

change
 

An editor has requested deletion of User:CPacker/WikiProject Oklahoma, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2014/User:CPacker/WikiProject Oklahoma and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 11:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply