CPacker
Archives |
---|
On the matter of Steppenwolf...
changeRegarding your edit to the said article...even if the song has appeared in many movies, I believe one is sufficient for the article. I don't see a problem with having all the movies listed, but I also don't see the problem with having just one article listed. I do think it's an important part of the article, because it's probably the bands only claim to fame. Thanks, --Isis♠(talk) 20:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- Okay. I know nothing about this band, so just...disregard me...--Isis♠(talk) 20:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Thankyou
changeI am the botmaster of User:DragonBot and reverted an edit caused by someone's vandalism in vi.wiki that my bot propogated. You almost screwed up by re-reverting my edit. Fortunately User:SilvonenBot corrected ur edit before some other bot propogated it to all wikis. Please be more careful when reverting bot edit reverts. --Jacob.jose (talk) 01:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Nudity
changeYou commented at the voting discussion for Wikipedia:Proposed_very_good_articles#Nudity_2. Another user has expressed concerns that there are some sourcing issues with the article that need to be addressed before this is passed as a very good article. Would you mind reviewing the discussion at the vote page and adding your input (or help to find sources, if you can)? Thank you, Either way (talk) 22:02, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Quick deletion of Template:Natural disasters by year
changeThe page you wrote, Template:Natural disasters by year, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Hazard-SJ Talk 21:33, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Quick deletion of Template:Green Bay Packers roster
changeThe page you wrote, Template:Green Bay Packers roster, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 00:03, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Quick deletion of Template:Okstub
changeThe page you wrote, Template:Okstub, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 04:38, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Quick deletion of Template:Demonstrate template
changeThe page you wrote, Template:Demonstrate template, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 04:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Call me please Caleb
changeJohn at 800-455-3393 re: i would like to use some of your photos vis a vis accreditation
An editor has requested deletion of User:CPacker/WikiProject Oklahoma, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2014/User:CPacker/WikiProject Oklahoma and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Auntof6 (talk) 11:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC)