Disinformation

false or misleading information that is spread deliberately to deceive and manipulate

Disinformation is false or inaccurate information spread on purpose[1] to deceive the targeted audience. Disinformation may include the distribution of forged documents, manuscripts and photographs, or the promotion of harmful rumors, conspiracy theories and fake intelligence.[2][3]

Conspiracy theories

change

A major form of disinformation is conspiracy theories. Examples of conspiracy theories include but not limited to

Online disinformation

change

Disinformation is particularly common on the most visited websites worldwide,[17] including Wikipedia,[18][19] Reddit[20] and Instagram.[21][22] On January 23, 2025, the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) said in a press release that a UNESCO study found 16% of all Holocaust-related content across social media to be denying or distorting.[23][24]

Wikipedia

change

Croatian Wikipedia

change

Between 2009 and 2021, Croatian Wikipedia was controlled by a group of far-right administrators who promoted Holocaust denial by censoring[18] the war crimes of the pro-Nazi Ustaše-ruled Independent State of Croatia (NDH)[25] and blocking dozens of rule-abiding users for trying to remove the false content.[18]

Željko Jovanović, the Minister of Science of Croatia back then, also advised against the use of the Croatian Wikipedia.[26] The most serious violation by the far-right administrators was their anti-historical designation of the Jasenovac concentration camp, in which 77,000–99,000 were killed,[27] as a "collection camp".[18] Their Holocaust denial was condemned by scholars, officials, advocacy groups and media critics.[18]

Following a year-long investigation (2020–21) by the Wikimedia Foundation, several complicit users and administrators were either banned or demoted, with one of the administrators found to have consolidated his or her power with 80 sockpuppet accounts.[28]

English Wikipedia

change

The English Wikipedia was criticized for condoning the systematic whitewashing of Nazi war criminals in thousands of WWII-related articles.[29] For instance, Arthur Nebe, a senior SS official who invented mobile gas chambers to kill Jews, was portrayed as a savior of Jews based on distortion of a cited source that actually said the opposite,[29] while false claims of Nazi war criminals "opposing" Hitler were made.[29] SS units responsible for the Holocaust were either depicted as brave fighters or described in passive voice to make their atrocities look normal.[29]

Those who corrected the false content had also faced persistent harassment from pro-Nazi users, some of whom were found to have repeatedly cited materials from Holocaust-denying sources (e.g. Journal of Historical Review, Nation Europa and Franz Kurowski[29]) misrepresented them as academic consensus and gamed the rules to prevent the removal of such content.[29] The violations continued for years with limited administrative intervention,[29] which mainstreamed Nazi sympathy among young readers and hurt efforts to preserve the Holocaust's historical truth.[29] German military historian Jens Westemeier commented on the issue,[29]

The English Wikipedia pages are far more sympathetic towards the Wehrmacht and Waffen-SS than the German ones [. ...] Wikipedia and Amazon are the worst distributors of pro-Nazi perspectives and the ["clean"] Wehrmacht myth.

In 2023, Holocaust historians Prof. Jan Grabowski and Dr. Shira Klein published a 57-page article titled Wikipedia’s Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust[30] in The Journal of Holocaust Research wherein they reported to have found widespread distortion of the Polish Holocaust history on the English Wikipedia,[19][30] which involved the exaggeration[19][30] of Jewish collaboration with Nazi/Soviet occupiers, invention of Jewish "atrocities" against Poles, downplaying of Polish collaboration with Nazi/Soviet occupiers and blaming Jews for their own suffering in the Holocaust.[19][30]

Prof. Grabowski and Dr. Klein also criticized English Wikipedia's administrators and Wikimedia Foundation's lack of will to handle,[19][30] leaving the site vulnerable to state-sponsored disinformation:

Wikipedia’s administrators have largely failed to uphold Wikipedia’s policies [. ...] unable to deal with the issue of persistent distortion [...] Wikipedia’s articles [...] have become a hub of misinformation and antisemitic canards.

On another occasion, Prof. Grabowski said,[19]

As a historian, I was aware [...] of various distortions [...] of the Holocaust on Wikipedia. What I found shocking, was the sheer scale [...] and the small number of individuals needed to distort the history of one of the greatest tragedies in the history of humanity.

In 2024, independent journalist investigations uncovered a large-scale off-site canvassing campaign to rewrite Jewish history and reshape the narrative surrounding the Israel–Palestine conflict, which involved 40 accounts having made at least 2,000,000 edits to over 10,000 Jewish-related articles.[31]

The off-site canvassing campaign was coordinated by an 8,000-member Tech for Palestine Discord channel,[31] where the organizers provided the participants in-depth training (e.g. strategy planning sessions, group audio "office hour" chats)[31] on getting used to Wikipedia's site operation, assigning participants (in groups of 2~3) to edit hundreds of articles in rotation,[31] and gaming the rules to block others from correcting them.[31]

Reported examples of their revisionist[32] edits include[31]

  • Removal of "Land of Israel" from the origin of Jews in Jewish-related articles
  • Removal of mentions of 16th century Jewish immigration to Israel in Jewish-related articles
  • Removal of mentions of Hamas' 1988 charter which involved the incitement to mass murder of Jews
  • Removal of mentions of the Palestinian Grand Mufti of Jerusalem's alliance with Hitler[33][34] in Holocaust-related articles
  • Redefinition of Jews as an "ethnoreligious group and cultural community" from "ethnoreligious group and nation from the Levant" in Jewish-related articles

On 12 December 2024, English Wikipedia's arbitration committee announced that two editors[35] had been site-banned indefinitely for off-site canvassing[31][35] and "encouraging other users to game the extended confirmed restriction and engage in disruptive editing."[35] Another three editors have also been sanctioned for similar reasons.[35] On January 17, 2025, English Wikipedia's arbitration committee further voted to impose indefinite topic-bans on multiple longtime editors associated with the organized campaign.[36] ADL's CEO Jonathan Greenblatt commented,[36]

[I]t is now imperative for Wikipedia to [...] undo the harm caused by these rogue but prolific editors who [...] wreaked havoc across the platform [. ...] a systemic problem [...] that needs immediate action.

change

References

change
  1. "Learning Disinformation". The British Library Board. Archived from the original on 25 October 2007. Retrieved 14 December 2011.
  2. "Most Visited Websites in Worldwide 2024 | Open .Trends". Semrush. Retrieved December 12, 2024.
  3. 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 18.4
  4. 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 19.5
  5. "Gay club accused of being 'poisoned with antisemitism' changes tune". Jewish News. August 9, 2024. Retrieved December 14, 2024.
  6. "International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance issues urgent Holocaust distortion warning". International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA). January 23, 2025.
  7. "Social media feeds Holocaust denial and distortion, finds UN report". United Nations (UN). Retrieved January 23, 2025.
  8. "The Holocaust in Croatia". Yad Vashem. Retrieved October 24, 2024.
  9. "Jovanović: Djeco, ne baratajte hrvatskom Wikipedijom jer su sadržaji falsificirani" [Jovanović: "Children, do not use the Croatian Wikipedia because its contents are forgeries"]. Novi list (in Croatian). September 13, 2013. Retrieved September 13, 2013.
  10. "Croatian Wikipedia Disinformation Assessment-2021 – Meta". Meta Wikimedia. Retrieved 2021-06-14. Many articles created and edited by the members of this group present the views that match political and socio-cultural positions advocated by a loosely connected group of Croatian radical right political parties and ultra-conservative populist movements. The group has been using its positions of power to attract new like-minded contributors, silence and ban dissenters, manipulate community elections and subvert Wikipedia's and the broader movement's native conflict resolution mechanisms.
  11. 29.0 29.1 29.2 29.3 29.4 29.5 29.6 29.7 29.8
  12. 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 30.4 Grabowski, Jan; Klein, Shira (February 9, 2023). "Wikipedia's Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust". The Journal of Holocaust Research. 37 (2): 133–190. doi:10.1080/25785648.2023.2168939. Retrieved October 24, 2024.
  13. 31.0 31.1 31.2 31.3 31.4 31.5 31.6
  14. 35.0 35.1 35.2 35.3
  15. 36.0 36.1