Archives

change

Current

change
 
Hello, The Flying Spaghetti Monster. You have new messages at Liverpoolfan567's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

INOA

Why are you deleting this. It has already been approved as a credible article. It is a brand new inovation taking the world by storm. See all the write ups coming from magazine. There are plenty more where that comes from.

I already told you. The article is not notable for inclusion and is very complex and even now, spammy. Pmlineditor  05:24, 6 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Cream Pie

change

If you could please undo your edits to Cream pie that would be great. I linked it to the regular wiktionary because there's some text to explain what an ingredient is. But on the simple english wiktionary, there is no text to explain this. Explaining what an ingredient is is very important because come people reading the article might not know what it is. I-on 16:20, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Simple English Wiktionary is a wiki too. — μ 16:26, Wednesday January 6 2010 (UTC)
If you want to change it, you can do it yourself :D And if you want to link to the English Wiktionary not the simple just add En: before the Wikt, like this [[en:wikt:example|example]]. Also if you really wanted to, log on to the Simple English Wiktionary and write the Ingredient article yourself :D. Hope that helps FSM Noodly? 16:29, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

fair enough. thanks for the other tip. i made it bold. just as the tip says.I-on 16:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I tried your code and it doesn't work. So I say you did it, you FIX it. I-on 16:43, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fixed by me. It's an annoying feature of mediawiki. Griffinofwales (talk) 16:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Not annoying in the slightest. How'd you fix it? :P — μ 16:02, Saturday January 9 2010 (UTC)

my bad FSM. I thought you wouldn't listen to me so I got a little mad. Sorry. Thanks for the tips and the pic for cream pie and little rock nine.I-on 16:57, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

No problems. I should have known the right code in the first place :D FSM Noodly? 17:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

dude, not a test page, sorry but it was a stub.

change

Sex on fire (song). rethink next time. --Icek863 (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC) I havent had any problems with any users of yet on sew, i dont want any trouble now. good-bye. --Icek863 (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

See what I just put on your talk page. FSM Noodly? 22:05, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

i just did! god. plz stop or i will ask for some support. all iam saying. not reporting u for Harassment of yet. cool down man. :) get along thats all i want. --Icek863 (talk) 22:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quick deletion of Flamethrower

change
 

The page you wrote, Flamethrower, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was a page that had little or no meaning. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Wpeaceout (talk) 07:21, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

HELP!!!!

change

Ok, I don't know what is wrong with Template:Infobox Football Club. Just look at Arsenal FC's page. Or Real Madrid's page. Can you help me? Thanks.RomeEonBmbo (talk) 22:49, 16 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disputed move

change

I see you moved Ecstasy to MDMA. I disagree somewhat, while I can see your argument that it is the correct chemical name, I think it should be named simple as we are the Simple English Wikipedia.--   Christnrockr90  09:53, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

The name Ecstacy is nearly always associated with the pill/tablet form of MDMA however it can be found in crystal or powder form, the article must be comprehensive and document all forms of the drug. Ecstacy is not simpler, it is incorrect. The actual name of this drug is MDMA and it should be labelled accordingly. FSM Noodly? 09:57, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Understandable, but quite honestly who, besides people who know this, are gonna search this name? I think WP:COMMONNAME applies.--   Christnrockr90  10:02, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Other websites opposed to References?

change

Which should I list? Thank you. --Iceking2x2 (talk) 18:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

References if you use a citation like this - <ref>Insert footnote text here</ref>. But if you just want to add some websites that might be useful to readers, use other websites. Hope that helped! FSM Noodly? 18:04, 11 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quick deletion of Template:Tennis players infobox

change
 

The page you wrote, Template:Tennis players infobox, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was deprecated or replaced by a newer template and are completely unused and not linked to. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Auntof6 (talk) 05:31, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Rights removal

change

In accordance with Wikipedia:Inactive administrators your rights have been removed. If you do become active again in the future you may go through a new RfA to receive them back. Thanks for your service. -DJSasso (talk) 15:43, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

How many edits did I make in 2010, just out of interest? I'm really not bothered to count them manually FSM Noodly? 20:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
2011, to which this decision relates, saw you make 38 edits. HTH, Goblin 20:14, 2 January 2012 (UTC) I ♥ Jersey!Reply

Oh yeah, 2011 sorry. Thanks! FSM Noodly?

Quick deletion of Headshot

change
 

The page you wrote, Headshot, has been selected for quick deletion. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. You can find more information about the reason here. Auntof6 (talk) 08:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

RfD nomination of Beret

change
 

An editor has requested deletion of Beret, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2015/Beret and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. Hydriz (talk) 04:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

change
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

change

(Sorry to write in English)